Calvinism
DIBS is non-Calvinistic. The
following points briefly highlight differences between the general
position of DIBS and Calvinism:
- Total Depravity. Calvinism teaches that man is so
depraved he cannot believe to be saved. We believe man is so
depraved he must believe to be saved. People are lost because of
their personal sin and rebellion against God. Their sin makes them
lost, but it does not render them incapable of all spiritual
responses. While the Bible does describe the lost as dead in sin,
it also describes them as weak (Romans 5:6, "When we were yet
without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly") and as
sick (Luke 5:31-32, "They that are well need not a physician, but
they that are sick. I came not to call the righteous, but sinners
to repentance"). When the Bible says that the lost are dead in
sin, it means that they are without the life of God, without
eternal life. It does not mean that they are incapable of
spiritual response. Without capability, there can be no
accountability. The rest of the points of Calvinism depend heavily
on their view of the inability of the lost to believe.
- Unconditional Election. Calvinism teaches that God
chose to save certain people and to not save others, and that He
made that decision without taking into account whether they would
trust Christ as their Savior. We believe that God in His
sovereignty gave man the capacity to make genuine choices ("free
will") and that He chose (elected) to save all those whom He
foresaw would trust in Christ. Since Calvinists believe that the
lost cannot believe, they must conclude that election could not be
conditional on foreseen faith. Rather, they hold that foreseen
faith must be based on unconditional election. They do not believe
that "whosoever will (wants) may come" but that "whosoever may
will come." In the book of Romans the argument is not whether
election is conditional or unconditional, but whether it is
conditional on faith or on works. Election is of grace (Romans
11:5, "there is a remnant according to the election of grace. And
if by grace, then is it no more of works; otherwise grace is no
more grace"), and therefore it must be of faith to be by grace
(Romans 4:16, "It is of faith, that it might be by grace").
- Limited Atonement. Calvinism teaches that Jesus
Christ's death was only for the elect, that He did not die (in any
effectual sense) for the non-elect. We believe, however, that the
death of Christ makes it possible for anyone to be saved, so long
as they accept Christ as their Savior. When we give the gospel of
people and tell them that Christ died for their sins so that they
could be saved, we do not have to add a footnote that says, "as
long as you are one of the elect." The offer of salvation by grace
through faith is valid and genuine for all. When someone dies and
goes to hell, it is not because Christ did not die for him
(because He did), nor is it because he was incapable of believing
the gospel (because he was capable), but because he wilfully chose
reject God and not to accept Christ.
- Irresistible Grace. Calvinism teaches that unregenerate
people cannot trust Christ as their Savior. Both sides agree that,
since salvation requires faith, God must draw someone to Himself
and enable him to believe. However, Calvinism holds that God only
draws the elect in a way that can lead to salvation, and that when
He does draw them by His grace, they cannot and will not resist.
While we do agree that lost people cannot come to God unless He
draws them, we believe that He draws all people to Himself. But we
also hold that people can and do resist Him. People are lost, not
because God has not drawn them to Himself. They are lost because,
in spite of His wooing of them, they have willfully rejected
Him.
- Perseverance of the Saints. Calvinism teaches that,
once someone is saved, he will persevere in the faith and will not
fall away from faith in Christ. Some people mistakenly think that
the perseverance of the saints refers to eternal security--the
doctrine that saved people cannot lose their salvation. It does
not (at least not directly). Rather, it refers to the view that
believers will not backslide and stay in that backslidden state.
While some Calvinists will grant that believers might backslide,
they argue that such people cannot have assurance of their
salvation while in that state. Other Calvinists argue that if a
person backslides it is proof that he was never saved in the first
place. Some of them argue that if it were possible for a believer
to abandon the faith that he would thereby lose his salvation. In
this regard some Calvinists are theoretically in agreement with
those who say you can lose your salvation. Some Arminians hold
that you do lose your salvation if you do not persevere in the
faith, while some Calvinists agree that you would lose it if you
could abandon the faith. In contrast to this teaching, we believe
that salvation cannot be lost; that while living a godly life is
the expected norm for believers, believers can and do at times
abandon the faith; and that assurance of salvation is based on the
promise of the gospel, not on one's works or perseverance in
godliness.
The differences between Calvinism and the position of us at DIBS
is great and profound. Those differences extend beyond just these
five very important points. They have an impact on one's view of what
God is like and what man is like. They have extensive ramifications
on such diverse areas as personal responsibility (people are lost
because they have chosen to reject God, not because God has chosen to
reject them), the nature of salvation, the focus of Scripture and how
it is to be interpreted, and the prophetic program of God
(premillennialism versus a- or postmillennialism). Additionally, the
differences impact the nature of one's motivation for evangelism and
sanctification (my choice of whether to do those things can make an
eternal difference). But perhaps the greatest impact these
differences have in the lives of believers (at least of some
believers) is on their personal fellowship with God. Christians who
have conscientiously rejected Calvinism find the image of God they
see in Calvinism to be at odds with the loving God with whom they
have fallen in love.